BioAcyl Corp |
![]() |
| Resource type: Journal Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.08.007 ID no. (ISBN etc.): 0012-1606 BibTeX citation key: Seifert2018 View all bibliographic details |
Categories: BioAcyl Corp Subcategories: Mammalian blastema Creators: Muneoka, Seifert Collection: Developmental Biology |
Views: 4/143
|
|
Conclusiones
Several factors have emerged from the vertebrate regeneration literature as key components in all known examples of blastema-based epimorphic regeneration. These include:
(1) formation of a specialized wound epidermis that functions to attract blastemal cells and maintain cell proliferation (Globus et al., 1980b, Thornton, 1957a, Thornton and Steen, 1962, Thornton and Thronton, 1965), (2) dependence on innervation and exposure to nerve or Schwann cell secreted factors (Farkas et al., 2016, Kumar et al., 2007, Mescher et al., 1997, Mullen et al., 1996, Singer, 1952), (3) formation of a pro-regenerative extracellular matrix (Calve et al., 2010, Gawriluk et al., 2016, Mailman and Dresden, 1979, Marrero et al., 2017, Onda et al., 1991, Satoh et al., 2012, Seifert et al., 2012, Tassava et al., 1996, Vinarsky et al., 2005), (4) deployment of major developmental signaling pathways (rev. in Stoick-Cooper et al., 2007), (5) physical interaction of cells from antonymic positions in three-dimensional space (Carlson, 1974, Cook and Seifert, 2016, Lheureux, 1975a, Lheureux, 1975b), (6) recognition of uninjured versus new tissue and thus level-specific replacement of appropriate tissue to generate a complete organ and (7) a dependence on macrophages to initiate regeneration (Godwin et al., 2013, Petrie et al., 2014, Simkin et al., 2017). Together, these features contribute to, and support, blastema formation, without which regeneration will not occur. Against the backdrop of these features epimorphic regeneration involves two major transformations in response to injury: 1) mature tissue into a blastema and 2) a blastema into a regenerated organ. Viewed in this light, the blastema is the link between healing and morphogenesis. Added by: Dr. Enrique Feoli Last edited by: Dr. Enrique Feoli |
| Abstract |
|
Studying regeneration in animals where and when it occurs is inherently interesting and a challenging research topic within developmental biology. Historically, vertebrate regeneration has been investigated in animals that display enhanced regenerative abilities and we have learned much from studying organ regeneration in amphibians and fish. From an applied perspective, while regeneration biologists will undoubtedly continue to study poikilothermic animals (i.e., amphibians and fish), studies focused on homeotherms (i.e., mammals and birds) are also necessary to advance regeneration biology. Emerging mammalian models of epimorphic regeneration are poised to help link regenerative biology and regenerative medicine. The regenerating rodent digit tip, which parallels human fingertip regeneration, and the regeneration of large circular defects through the ear pinna in spiny mice and rabbits, provide tractable, experimental systems where complex tissue structures are regrown through blastema formation and morphogenesis. Using these models as examples, we detail similarities and differences between the mammalian blastema and its classical counterpart to arrive at a broad working definition of a vertebrate regeneration blastema. This comparison leads us to conclude that regenerative failure is not related to the availability of regeneration-competent progenitor cells, but is most likely a function of the cellular response to the microenvironment that forms following traumatic injury. Recent studies demonstrating that targeted modification of this microenvironment can restrict or enhance regenerative capabilities in mammals helps provide a roadmap for eventually pushing the limits of human regeneration.
|
| Notes |
|
Added by: Dr. Enrique Feoli Last edited by: Dr. Enrique Feoli |